1Partial orders¶
A nonstrict partial order on A is (r), (as), and (t). Example: ≤.
A strict partial order is (ir), (as), and (t). Example: <.
The idea of a partial order is to have things happening in a certain order, but with some freedom. For instance, a and b might have to be before c, but a can be before or after b, etc.
If R is a strict partial order, then R∪ΔA is a nonstrict partial order. (From <to≤, etc.) If R is a nonstrict partial order, then R∖ΔA is strict.
1.1Total orders¶
A partial order is also a total order if the property of totality is satisfies, i.e., if aRb or bRa or a=b for all a,b∈A.
1.2Power sets¶
If X is any set, P(X) (the power set of X) is a collection of subsets in X ({Y:Y⊆X}), i.e., the elements are sets.
For example, if X={a,b,c}, P(X)={∅,{a},{b},{c},{a,b},{b,c},{a,b,c}} which is pretty cool. The empty set is always in a power set, as is X itself.
N.B. P(X)={∅,X}⟺|x|≤1} (i.e. X is a singleton or the empty set)
There is natural partial order on this set (and this works for any set of sets I think): If R is ⊆, then R is a partial order of P(X). This partial ordering is: (r), as Y is always ⊆1; (as), because if Y⊆Z and Z⊆Y then Y=Z; (t) because if Y⊆W and W⊆Z then Y⊆Z.
Diagrammatically, this is a cube (or rather the Hasse diagram of a lattice - more on that later):
Note that this is not a total order. For instance, {a} and {b} are not related, and are not the same. For the power set to be a total order, X would have to be a singleton (or the empty set?).
1.3More partial orders¶
Another example of a partial order is the "divides" relation. (Recall: A=N, R=∣, a∣b if a divides b). This is not a total order.
1.4Hasse diagrams¶
Given a small partial order on a set A, we can draw a Hasse diagram. Just write down all the elements in the poset2 and draw a non-horizontal line between two elements if the bottom element, a, is related to the top element b (as in, aRb).
For example: A={x∈N:x∣24}={1,2,3,4,6,8,12,24} (so all the factors of 24). This is a partial but not a total order (for example, 2 does not divide 3). The Hasse diagram would look as follows:
Another example: the factors of 30, with the "divides" relation. The Hasse diagram would look like:
Similarly, we can define An for any n as the number to find the factors of (not standard notation). For which values of n is it true that the set is totally ordered? Well, when n is 1, when n is a prime, and n is a power of a prime. Wow
1.5Lattices¶
Not all Hasse diagrams are lattices. For example, a sort of straightened figure eight would not be. Here's the definition of a lattice:
Lattice: a partially ordered set such that
1. There is a bottom element called ⊥ such that ⊥≤a for all a (so related to everything else, in an underneath sort of way)
2. There is a top element called ⊤ such that a≤⊤ for all a
3. Given any a,b∈A, there is an element c (the smallest thing "above" both a and b - i.e. for any d∈A with a≤d, b≤d, we have c≤d) that is called the "join" of the two elements. The notation is a∨b. So, the least upper bound of (a,b).
4. There is also a greatest upper bound - the meet of the two elements - which is represented by a∧b.
For example, with divisibility and N, a∨b is the least common multiple, and a∧b is the great common divisor.
The join and meet of any two elements are unique. Proof: since a≤c, b≤c, we have c≤c′. Also, a≤c′, b≤c′, so c′≤c. By antisymmetry, c=c′.
Triviality: if a≤b in a lattice then a∨b=b, a∧b=a.